L. Flach
R. Czichos
M. Haile-Selassie
Result Ă— Home win
Pre-game odds
1 | X | 2 | |
---|---|---|---|
Odds |
2.05
|
3.60
|
3.40
|
Prob. |
48.8%
|
27.8%
|
29.4%
|
Key points
• Chicago Fire's recent form is inconsistent, with 2 wins, 2 draws, and 2 losses in their last 6 games.
• Philadelphia Union is struggling, sitting 12th with just 20 points from 20 games.
• Both teams have shown defensive vulnerabilities, with high goals conceded per match.
• High-scoring encounters are likely, with over 2.5 goals in most recent games.
• Chicago Fire's recent home form includes 3 consecutive defeats but with a recent victory.
• Philadelphia Union's recent away form is inconsistent, with a concerning trend of 3 consecutive defeats.
Current streaks
Chicago Fire
0
2
2
0
0
10
Philadelphia Union
0
5
1
0
0
10
Recent form
Chicago Fire
Chicago Fire's recent form has been inconsistent, with two wins, two draws, and two losses in their last six games. They are currently sitting in 15th position in the league table, having earned 18 points from 20 games. The team has shown an ability to score goals, netting 11 in their previous six matches, with an average of 1.83 goals per game. However, their defense has been somewhat porous, conceding 10 goals in the same period, at a rate of 1.67 per game. Notably, both teams have scored in all of their last six games, and 67% of these matches have seen over 2.5 goals, indicating a tendency for high-scoring encounters. A standout result is their 4-2 loss against Orlando City, which represents the highest-scoring game in this set of fixtures.
Philadelphia Union
The Philadelphia Union find themselves in a difficult patch of form, currently sitting 12th in the league with just 20 points from 20 games. Their recent results have been disappointing, with four losses in their last six matches, including a current run of three consecutive defeats. The team has struggled defensively, conceding 14 goals in these six games at a rate of 2.33 per match, and has failed to keep a single clean sheet during this period. On a more positive note, the Union have been involved in several high-scoring encounters, with five of their last six games featuring over 2.5 goals and both teams scoring in 83% of these matches. The 4-2 loss against CF Montréal and the narrow 4-3 defeat to FC Cincinnati stand out as particularly goal-laden affairs.
Chicago Fire
DDWWLL
W2 D2 L2
11
1.8
10
1.7
+1
0
3.5
100%
33%
67%
Philadelphia Union
WLWLLL
W2 D0 L4
13
2.2
14
2.3
-1
0
4.5
83%
17%
83%
Recent home/away form
Chicago Fire
Chicago Fire's recent home form has been inconsistent, with a notable run of three consecutive defeats against Columbus Crew, Charlotte FC, and New England Revolution. However, they managed to break this losing streak with a draw against Orlando City and a recent victory over LA Galaxy. The majority of their home games have been low-scoring affairs, with 67% of the matches featuring under 2.5 goals. The Fire's goalscoring has been a concern, averaging only 0.67 goals per game, while conceding an average of 1.17 goals per game. Despite their struggles, the win against LA Galaxy could potentially be a turning point for the team as they look to improve their home form and climb up from their current 15th position in the league.
Philadelphia Union
Philadelphia Union's recent away form has been inconsistent, with a mix of wins, draws, and losses. They are currently struggling in the league, sitting in 12th position with just 20 points from 20 games. In their last six away matches, the Union have suffered three defeats in a row, which is a concerning trend. These games have been particularly high-scoring, with an average of 5.17 goals per game and 83% of the matches featuring over 2.5 goals. Both teams have scored in 67% of these fixtures, highlighting the Union's defensive vulnerabilities. However, they did manage to secure an impressive 5-1 victory against First State in the NPSL, showing their potential to score goals on the road.
Chicago Fire
DLLLDW
W1 D2 L3
4
0.7
7
1.2
-3
1
1.83
50%
67%
33%
Philadelphia Union
DLDLWL
W1 D2 L3
14
2.3
17
2.8
-3
1
5.17
67%
17%
83%